linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:35:43 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C

On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:30 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Is there some way to force GCC to do what I want (interleave the
> functions)? It seems happy to inline them and then optimize the
> register
> usage and instruction ordering. Perhaps that is OK though and we're
> wasting our time trying to be conservative in code size. 

Is it possible to do all this in assembly ? Can't you have the default
implementation using this assembly with different function names, then
just set the assembly function names in C code someplace?

Daniel

-- 
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/