linux-kernel - Re: Why not distribute timer handlers on CPUs on SMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <AD61E4A9-2622-47F8-911C-A2FCF9F34BF8@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:50:48 +0800
From:	bhs <haishan.bai@...il.com>
To:	bhs <haishan.bai@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why not distribute timer handlers on CPUs on SMP


On Oct 6, 2010, at 9:05 AM, bhs wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I am just curious about why handle the timer functions on a CPU serially but not distribute them over CPUs
> even on a SMP system?
> 


Yea, it already distributed over CPUs at calling add_timer(), timer function was bounded to a cpu on which
it was created.

I am sorry for my noise.

 
> The timer wheel handler function __run_timers() serializes the timer functions on a CPU,
> is there any design consideration that handling timers on a CPU is more reasonable than distribute them
> over CPUs?
> 
> 
> Best regards
> Shan Hai

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/