linux-kernel - Re: Section mismatches in memblock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CABE739.8050001@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:04:25 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Section mismatches in memblock

On 10/05/2010 07:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> Wrong functions!  Furhtermore, at least the tip tree definitely does not
> have __init_memblock here:
> 

Nevermind.  I had missed that Ingo had put stuff into core/memblock on
top of x86/memblock, just to be confusing.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/