[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CADCCF8.5000408@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:36:56 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
riel@...hat.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org, mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/12] Let host know whether the guest can handle async
PF in non-userspace context.
On 10/04/2010 05:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> If guest can detect that it runs in non-preemptable context it can
> handle async PFs at any time, so let host know that it can send async
> PF even if guest cpu is not in userspace.
>
>
>
> MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN: 0x4b564d02
> data: Bits 63-6 hold 64-byte aligned physical address of a 32bit memory
> - area which must be in guest RAM. Bits 5-1 are reserved and should be
> + area which must be in guest RAM. Bits 5-2 are reserved and should be
> zero. Bit 0 is 1 when asynchronous page faults are enabled on the vcpu
> - 0 when disabled.
> + 0 when disabled. Bit 2 is 1 if asynchronous page faults can be injected
> + when vcpu is in kernel mode.
Please use cpl instead of user mode and kernel mode. The original terms
are ambiguous for cpl ==1 || cpl == 2.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists