lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101007012136.GS19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 02:21:36 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: initialize structure memory to zero for shmctl

On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 05:10:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The old shm interface will leak a few bytes of stack contents. Explicitly
> initialize the structure to zero-fill the untouched fields.

Umm...  I wonder if we ever have gaps in there; note that gaps between
the fields are _not_ initialized in compound literals.  Yes, I realize
that it's a separate problem, but explicit memset() prior to initializations
of fields might be a better solution, covering both.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ