[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101007012136.GS19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 02:21:36 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: initialize structure memory to zero for shmctl
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 05:10:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The old shm interface will leak a few bytes of stack contents. Explicitly
> initialize the structure to zero-fill the untouched fields.
Umm... I wonder if we ever have gaps in there; note that gaps between
the fields are _not_ initialized in compound literals. Yes, I realize
that it's a separate problem, but explicit memset() prior to initializations
of fields might be a better solution, covering both.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists