linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Read TSC upon resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:15:36 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, stefan.bader@...onical.com,
	brad.figg@...onical.com, apw@...onical.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Read TSC upon resume

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Sameer Nanda wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:43:34AM -0700, Sameer Nanda wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >> > And are you always going to be printing this out?  Why do we want to
> >> > know this every time?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes, every time.  This helps track variance in BIOS resume times within a
> >> single boot.
> >
> > Is that really something that users can do something about?
> 
> Aside from complaining to the BIOS vendors, no :)

Then I would not recommend adding this patch, as it is irrelevant for
99.9999% of all Linux users.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/