[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101007205049.GB32726@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:50:49 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...ntu.com>
Cc: Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin@...onical.com>, len.brown@...el.com,
alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dell-laptop: Add hwswitch_only module parameter
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:49:05PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Hi Matthew:
> > Is the kernel able to unblock it under those circumstances?
>
> Manually running rfkill unblock will unblock it in this broken
> firmware scenario in question.
So the issue is in the firmware's response to the keystroke? Ok. I'd
rather have a DMI list of the broken machines than a module parameter.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists