linux-kernel - [PATCH] memcg: lock-free clear page writeback (Was Re: [PATCH 04/10] memcg: disable local interrupts in lock_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101007152422.c5919517.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:24:22 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] memcg: lock-free clear page writeback  (Was Re: [PATCH
 04/10] memcg: disable local interrupts in lock_page_cgroup()

Greg, I think clear_page_writeback() will not require _any_ locks with this patch.
But set_page_writeback() requires it...
(Maybe adding a special function for clear_page_writeback() is better rather than
 adding some complex to switch() in update_page_stat())

==
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

Now, at page information accounting, we do lock_page_cgroup() if pc->mem_cgroup
points to a cgroup where someone is moving charges from.

At supporing dirty-page accounting, one of troubles is writeback bit.
In general, writeback can be cleared via IRQ context. To update writeback bit
with lock_page_cgroup() in safe way, we'll have to disable IRQ.
....or do something.

This patch waits for completion of writeback under lock_page() and do
lock_page_cgroup() in safe way. (We never got end_io via IRQ context.)

By this, writeback-accounting will never see race with account_move() and
it can trust pc->mem_cgroup always _without_ any lock.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

Index: mmotm-0928/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-0928.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-0928/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2183,17 +2183,35 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(st
 /*
  * check whether the @pc is valid for moving account and call
  * __mem_cgroup_move_account()
+ * Don't call this under pte_lock etc...we'll do lock_page() and wait for
+ * the end of I/O.
  */
 static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
 		struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to, bool uncharge)
 {
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+ 	 * We move severl flags and accounting information here. So we need to
+ 	 * avoid the races with update_stat routines. For most of routines,
+ 	 * lock_page_cgroup() is enough for avoiding race. But we need to take
+ 	 * care of IRQ context. If flag updates comes from IRQ context, This
+ 	 * "move account" will be racy (and cause deadlock in lock_page_cgroup())
+ 	 *
+ 	 * Now, the only race we have is Writeback flag. We wait for it cleared
+ 	 * before starting our jobs.
+ 	 */
+
+	lock_page(pc->page);
+	wait_on_page_writeback(pc->page);
+
 	lock_page_cgroup(pc);
 	if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
 		__mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to, uncharge);
 		ret = 0;
 	}
 	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
+	unlock_page(pc->page);
 	/*
 	 * check events
 	 */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/