[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1286522543.8189.13.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:22:23 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Improve load balancing when tasks have large
weight differential
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 01:23 -0700, Nikhil Rao wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 12:32 -0700, Nikhil Rao wrote:
> >> The closest I have is a quad-core dual-socket machine (MC, CPU
> >> domains). And I'm having trouble reproducing it on that machine as
> >> well :-( I ran 5 soaker threads (one of them niced to -15) for a few
> >> hours and didn't see the problem. Can you please give me some trace
> >> data & schedstats to work with?
> >
> > Booting with isolcpus or offlining the excess should help.
> >
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Booting with isolcpus did the trick, thanks.
>
> ... and now to dig into why this is happening.
I was poking it (again) yesterday, and it's kind of annoying. I can't
call this behavior black/white broken. It's freeing up a cache for a
very high priority task, which is kinda nice, but SMP nice is costing
25% of my box's processor power in this case too. Hrmph.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists