linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/18] fs: Factor inode hash operations into functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101008072947.GC7831@lst.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:29:47 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/18] fs: Factor inode hash operations into functions

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:24PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> 
> Before replacing the inode hash locking with a more scalable
> mechanism, factor the removal of the inode from the hashes rather
> than open coding it in several places.
> 
> Based on a patch originally from Nick Piggin.

Looks good as an equal transformation, but what code is doing with
remove_inode_hash looks really buggy.  It's doing a re-hash of a live
inode which is probably causing enough problems by itself, but should
at least have locks for it.  Anyway, that's something for the coda folks
to sort out.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/