[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1286532155.2095.52.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:02:35 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
To: ext Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"xia.wu@...el.com" <xia.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdi: use deferable timer for sync_supers task
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:25 +0200, ext Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:35:14PM +0800, Yong Wang wrote:
> > sync_supers task currently wakes up periodically for superblock
> > writeback. This hurts power on battery driven devices. This patch
> > turns this housekeeping timer into a deferable timer so that it
> > does not fire when system is really idle.
>
> How long can the timer be defereed? We can't simply stop writing
> out data for a long time. I think the current timer value should be
> the upper bound, but allowing to fire earlier to run during the
> same wakeup cycle as others is fine.
Infinitely.
There are range hrtimers which can do exactly what you said - you
specify the hard and soft limits there.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists