lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:33:55 -0700 From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com> To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de> CC: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.36-rc7 On 10/08/2010 05:06 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Thursday 07 October 2010 19:49:28 Eric Paris wrote: >> The safest thing would probably be to punt the syscalls to 2.6.37. >> Which is sad since I know a number of people are already working against >> them, but maybe that proves it's the best approach? > > I agree with removing the syscalls from 2.6.36 because of the following > reasons: How would the mechanics of this be achieved? Is it enough to just unconditionally return -ENOSYS from the sys_*() functions? Or should all the patches be reverted? David Daney -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists