[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101008170258.GJ10149@tux>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:02:59 -0700
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To: Suraj Sumangala <Suraj.Sumangala@...eros.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
CC: linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Firmware versioning best practices: ath3k-2.fw rename or replace
ath3k-1.fw ?
Suraj,
What is the difference between ath3k-2.fw and ath3k-1.fw ?
Won't the API change now that you are addressing the sflash
configuration fix? Would it not help to identify the two
different firmwares then?
David, Marcel, what are your preferences for a firmware upgrade
where the firmware does not change API (lets just pretend it does
not for a moment) ? Do we keep the same filename?
In this particular case I would assume our new sflash configuration
fix that might be being worked on might change the re-enumerated
USB device IDs so it seems to me a good idea to use a new filename.
I should note ath3k-2.fw already made it to linux-firmware.git...
I last tried to document a thread we had over this here:
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Documentation/firmware-versioning
Does this sound sane? If so then the sflash configuration fix
would seem to me like it would require a new filename. Now, while
we're at it, how about bug fixes?
Suraj -- keep these discussions public please....
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists