[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101008185739.GA6098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:57:40 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jeffrey Carlyle <jeff.carlyle@...orola.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Lun Chang <L.chang@...orola.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: avoid deadlock when disabling regulator
with supply
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:43:54PM -0500, Jeffrey Carlyle wrote:
> I have a regulator A that sets regulator B as its supply. When I call
> set_supply to add B as the supply for A, regulator A gets added to the
> supply_list for regulator B.
Looks good, thanks!
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
but some stylistic things below:
> Change-Id: I769669452b9e1b59b252298d589738aabb03529c
Hrm?
> static int _regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> static int _regulator_get_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> static unsigned int _regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev);
> @@ -1343,12 +1344,14 @@ int regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
> mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
> ret = _regulator_enable(rdev);
> mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_enable);
Random indentation change here.
> +
> + if (supply_rdev)
> + regulator_disable(
> + get_device_regulator(rdev_get_dev(supply_rdev))
> + );
> +
Eew, indentation! In cases like this it's better to just ignore the
excesive line length.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists