linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/6] Coccinelle: Use new comment format to explain kfree.cocci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1286566061-17122-5-git-send-email-npalix.work@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri,  8 Oct 2010 21:27:39 +0200
From:	Nicolas Palix <npalix.work@...il.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Nicolas Palix <npalix.work@...il.com>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	cocci@...u.dk
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] Coccinelle: Use new comment format to explain kfree.cocci

Use new comment format to separate proposed commit message
and information about generated false positives

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Palix <npalix.work@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
 scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci |    9 +++++----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci
index c13a539..f9f79d9 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
-/// Find a use after free.  Values of variables may imply that some
-/// execution paths are not possible, resulting in false positives.
-/// Another source of false positives are macros such as
-/// SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT_DEC that do not actually evaluate their argument
+/// Find a use after free.
+//# Values of variables may imply that some
+//# execution paths are not possible, resulting in false positives.
+//# Another source of false positives are macros such as
+//# SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT_DEC that do not actually evaluate their argument
 ///
 // Confidence: Moderate
 // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU.  GPLv2.
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/