linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.36-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201010082350.01135.agruen@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Oct 2010 23:50:00 +0200
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.36-rc7

On Friday 08 October 2010 18:33:55 David Daney wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 05:06 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 October 2010 19:49:28 Eric Paris wrote:
> >> The safest thing would probably be to punt the syscalls to 2.6.37.
> >> Which is sad since I know a number of people are already working against
> >> them, but maybe that proves it's the best approach?
> >
> > I agree with removing the syscalls from 2.6.36 because of the following
> > reasons:
> 
> How would the mechanics of this be achieved?
> 
> Is it enough to just unconditionally return -ENOSYS from the sys_*() 
> functions?  Or should all the patches be reverted?

Whatever works I guess ... they would get reactivated pretty soon, anyway.

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/