[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101008235741.GF30846@shell>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:57:42 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@....linux.org.uk, jmoyer@...hat.com, linux-fs@...r.kernel.org,
autofs@...ux.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] Make dentry::d_mounted into a more general field for special function dirs
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:15:31PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Make the d_mounted field in struct dentry into a more general field for special
> function directories such as mountpoints and autofs substructures.
>
> d_mounted is renamed d_managed, and that is split into three fields:
>
> (*) #define DMANAGED_MOUNTPOINT 0x0fffffff
No matter how hard I try, I always read this as "DAMAGED". Which I
can't help but imagine subliminally influences the reader's opinion of
the patches.
Of course I am excellent at naming things, see "chunkfs" and
"relatime". But some ideas for naming various concepts in this patch:
D_MIGHT_MOUNT
D_CHILL_OUT
D_ITS_COMPLICATED
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists