lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1286502453-7043-1-git-send-email-yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Date:	Fri,  8 Oct 2010 09:47:33 +0800
From:	yakui.zhao@...el.com
To:	hpa@...or.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] X86/Mem: Use string copy operation to optimze copy in kernel compression

From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>

It will parse the elf and then copy them to the corresponding destination after
the kernel decompression is finished. And now it uses the slow byte-copy mode.
How about using the string copy operation to accelerate the copy speed in
course of kernel compression?(It is orignated from the arch/x86/lib/memcpy_32.c)

In the test the copy performance can be improved very significantly after using
the string copy operation mechanism.
        1. The copy time can be reduced from 150ms to 20ms on one atom machine
	2. The copy time can be reduced about 80% on another machine
		The time is reduced from 7ms to 1.5ms when using 32-bit kernel.
		The time is reduced from 10ms to 2ms when using 64-bit kernel.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
index 8f7bef8..23f315c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
@@ -229,18 +229,35 @@ void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n)
 		ss[i] = c;
 	return s;
 }
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
 {
-	int i;
-	const char *s = src;
-	char *d = dest;
+	int d0, d1, d2;
+	asm volatile(
+		"rep ; movsl\n\t"
+		"movl %4,%%ecx\n\t"
+		"rep ; movsb\n\t"
+		: "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1), "=&S" (d2)
+		: "0" (n >> 2), "g" (n & 3), "1" (dest), "2" (src)
+		: "memory");
 
-	for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
-		d[i] = s[i];
 	return dest;
 }
+#else
+void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n)
+{
+	long d0, d1, d2;
+	asm volatile(
+		"rep ; movsq\n\t"
+		"movq %4,%%rcx\n\t"
+		"rep ; movsb\n\t"
+		: "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1), "=&S" (d2)
+		: "0" (n >> 3), "g" (n & 7), "1" (dest), "2" (src)
+		: "memory");
 
+	return dest;
+}
+#endif
 
 static void error(char *x)
 {
-- 
1.5.4.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ