| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:46:16 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org> To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>, John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.36-rc7 >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de> writes: Andreas> On Friday 08 October 2010 18:17:25 Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> Doesn't really solve ordering inside groups so maybe we do not need >> priorities at all just these three classes? Andreas> Applications can easily make the priority they register with Andreas> configurable (and default to something in their "range" if we Andreas> define such ranges). Wouldn't this be enough? What about conflicts, when two applications register with the same priority? And then one of the them exits, dies, fails, and re-registers itself. Does it get the same slot back? Does it goto the end of the line? If it's an HSM handling (or other content manipulation tool) what happens? These are the questions which need to be answered, and the ABI updated to reflect these questions. Even if it's just "We don't care..." it needs to be spelled out. John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists