linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: stop exporting openprom.h header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101009085143.GA1595@angua.secretlab.ca>
Date:	Sat, 9 Oct 2010 02:51:43 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: stop exporting openprom.h header

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 02:34:50PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:00:25 -0600
> Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:52 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > wrote:
> > > From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
> > > Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:34:24 -0700
> > >
> > >>
> > >> It's unknown why openprom.h was being exported; there doesn't seem
> > >> to be any reason for it currently, and it creates headaches with
> > >> userspace being able to potentially use the structures in there.
> > >>  So, don't export it anymore.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > 
> > I suppose it makes sense for me to pick this one up into my tree so it
> > is grouped with the rest of the pdt patches.  I'll pick it up once
> > Andres reposts the series.
> > 
> > g.
> 
> Ok, I sent a new version of the phandle stuff (which was easier than
> expected, and doesn't affect any other patches).
> 
> So to summarize, what's pending is:
> 
> 1- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/242041/ (sparc: stop exporting
>    openprom.h header)
>    Acked by Dave
> 
> 2- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/242601/ ([v3] sparc: convert
>    various prom_* functions to use phandle)
>    Acked by Dave
> 
> 3- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141011/ (sparc: break out some
>    PROM device-tree building code out into drivers/of)
>    Acked by Dave
> 
> 4- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141021/ (sparc: make
>    drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only)
>    Acked by Dave
> 
> 5- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141031/ (of: no longer call prom_
>    functions directly; use an ops structure)
>    Acked by Dave
> 
> 6- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141041/ (of: add
>    of_pdt namespace to pdt code)
>    Acked by Dave
> 
> 7- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141051/ (of: add package-to-path
>    support to pdt)

I've picked up 1-7 and am build testing now.

> 8- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141071/ (x86: OLPC: add OLPC
>    device-tree support)

I'm not happy about the /proc/devicetree stuff in this patch.  I would
rather see the proc_device_tree_init() call moved to initcall time
so that the need for an of_pdt_init_devicetree() hook goes away, but
there are a number of gotchas for dynamic tree users that I need to
investigate.  Anyway, I'll get 1-7 tested and into linux-next while I
think about patch 8.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/