linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: oprofile: Move non-ARM code into separate init/exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:32:43 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: oprofile: Move non-ARM code into separate
 init/exit

On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 03:26:47AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 08.10.10 20:46:20, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > In preparation for moving the majority of this oprofile code into an
> > architecture-neutral place separate the architecture-independent code
> > into oprofile_perf_init() and oprofile_perf_exit().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
> > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/oprofile/common.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> > index fd6e323..8718311 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> > @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static void arm_backtrace(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
> >  		tail = user_backtrace(tail);
> >  }
> >  
> > -int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> > +int __init oprofile_perf_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> >  {
> >  	int cpu, ret = 0;
> >  
> > @@ -387,12 +387,11 @@ int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ops->backtrace		= arm_backtrace;
> > -	ops->create_files	= op_arm_create_files;
> > -	ops->setup		= op_arm_setup;
> > -	ops->start		= op_arm_start;
> > -	ops->stop		= op_arm_stop;
> > -	ops->shutdown		= op_arm_stop;
> > +	ops->create_files	= oprofile_perf_create_files;
> > +	ops->setup		= oprofile_perf_setup;
> > +	ops->start		= oprofile_perf_start;
> > +	ops->stop		= oprofile_perf_stop;
> > +	ops->shutdown		= oprofile_perf_stop;
> 
> There is a compile breakage caused by patch #4. Will move the renames
> to patch #4 when applying the patch.

Sorry, I don't know how this happened. These renames were originally in
patch #4 but seem to have moved into #5 when I was reshuffling stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/