lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:06:08 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>, pedrib@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:34:50PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > On 10/10/2010 03:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely > > to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups. > > Shrug. The main encryption thread and ESSIV per-cpu are two separate > things from my point of view. Is not obvious to me. > > Anyway, the ball is on DM maintainer's playground now. Well I was told already for 2.6.35 it was ready to merge (and also I already have an active user base, people are using it because it's solving a wide spread problem) I am frankly somewhat surprised things should be suddenly completely open now again and such contortions as you did to the patch should be needed. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists