[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:18:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: PM / Runtime: Remove idle notification after failing
suspend (was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PM: add synchronous ...)
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Subject: PM / Runtime: Remove idle notification after failing suspend
>
> If runtime suspend of a device fails returning -EAGAIN or -EBUSY,
> which means that it's safe to try to suspend it again, the PM core
> runs the runtime idle helper function for it. Unfortunately this may
> lead to problems, for example for PCI devices whose drivers don't
> implement the ->runtime_idle() callback, because in that case the
> PCI bus type's ->runtime_idle() always calls pm_runtime_suspend()
> for the given device. Thus, if it is automatically called by a
> driver's ->runtime_suspend() returning -EAGAIN or -EBUSY, it will
> cause the suspend to happen again possibly causing a busy loop to
> appear. To avoid that, remove the idle notification after failing
> runtime suspend of a device altogether and let the callers of
> pm_runtime_suspend() repeat the operation if need be.
>
> Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
This is fine as far as I'm concerned.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists