lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 10 Oct 2010 05:34:53 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc:	Alon Ziv <alon+git@...aviz.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add Opticon OPN2001 write support

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:53:19PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10-10-2010 10:32, Alon Ziv wrote:
>
>> OPN2001 expects write operations to arrive as a vendor-specific command
>> through the control pipe (instead of using a separate bulk-out pipe).
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alon Ziv<alon-git@...aviz.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/usb/serial/opticon.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/opticon.c b/drivers/usb/serial/opticon.c
>> index 9ff19c8..4fe7c3d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/serial/opticon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/opticon.c
> [...]
>> @@ -237,10 +240,29 @@ static int opticon_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port,
>>
>>   	usb_serial_debug_data(debug,&port->dev, __func__, count, buffer);
>>
>> -	usb_fill_bulk_urb(urb, serial->dev,
>> -			  usb_sndbulkpipe(serial->dev,
>> -					  port->bulk_out_endpointAddress),
>> -			  buffer, count, opticon_write_bulk_callback, priv);
>> +	if (port->bulk_out_endpointAddress) {
>> +		usb_fill_bulk_urb(urb, serial->dev,
>> +				  usb_sndbulkpipe(serial->dev,
>> +						  port->bulk_out_endpointAddress),
>> +				  buffer, count, opticon_write_bulk_callback, priv);
>
>    Please align all follow-up lines uniformly.

Not a big deal.

>> +	} else {
>> +		struct usb_ctrlrequest *dr;
>> +
>> +		dr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest), GFP_NOIO);
>
>    sizeof(*dr) is a preferred form.

No, people disagree on this, there is no 'preferred' form, you are free
to use either way.

>> +		usb_fill_control_urb(urb, serial->dev,
>> +			usb_sndctrlpipe(serial->dev, 0),
>> +			(unsigned char *)dr, buffer, count,
>> +			opticon_write_bulk_callback, priv);
>
>    More tabs needed for alignment, I think...

It's fine, not a big deal.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ