[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101010130842.GE8256@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:08:43 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, pedrib@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2010 01:59 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
> >
> > [Due to popular demand this is a port of the dm-crypt scalability
> > patch to 2.6.36-rc7. The 2.6.35 and .32 patches were widely used by
> > lots of users with good results.
> >
>
> Hi Andi,
>
> please can you check split patches in
> http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/dm-crypt/2.6.36-devel/
>
> is there some change in your new version?
Yes I updated the work queue setup and ported it to
all these changes in 2.6.36.
See the changelog in the description.
I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely
to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups.
> Can I send this to dm-devel instead?
> (It is better for review.)
What review? The code has been ready since last merge window at least
and was revied back then is my understanding.
The various versions I posted have been extensively tested
by lots of people, including me.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists