linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101011123609.GL9231@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:36:09 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Ian Lartey <ian@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:15:55PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 13:00 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > ...it's not clear to me that this change is an improvement - it'll make
> > the driver more fragile in the face of errors, I don't see a benefit in
> > refusing to register the variant for one bus if the other fails?

> I tried to implement your variant with depca driver in past, but it was
> rejected by David Miller:
> http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2010/07/12/9

I disagree with David here, and in any case if you're going to make a
style change like this they really ought to be applied over all drivers
rather than just a few individual ones.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/