linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101011125934.GM9231@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:59:34 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Ian Lartey <ian@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8804: fix error handling code

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:50:56PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:

> It is not greppable situation to simply change the behavior of all
> drivers.  I was looking for memory leak bugs in drivers/net/ and fixed
> some of them.  Manual looking through _all_ drivers takes much more
> time.  In general I try to search for repeatable bugs with coccinelle,
> but it is rare case.

The method you're using to generate the patches is pretty much
orthogonal to anything else, except of course in the case where you're
also submitting the automation for checking (which is useful where
possible).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/