[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB3166B.8080008@ubuntu.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:51:39 +0100
From: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
To: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
CC: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...trum.cz>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>,
Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linuxram@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 v3] overlay: hybrid overlay filesystem prototype
On 06/10/2010 18:31, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:34:57AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> On Thursday 30 September 2010 23:51:15 Valerie Aurora wrote:
>>> Hm, this was a pretty basic assumption for me - that you'd want to
>>> construct a topmost image offline that would be "merged" with the
>>> lower layers. So, for example:
>>>
>>> Topmost layer contains:
>>>
>>> /etc/hostname
>>>
>>> Lower layers contain everything else in /etc/. So /etc/ would exist
>>> on the topmost layer at the time of union mount, but we would want it
>>> to be transparent. But if we created a new dir *during* the union
>>> mount, it would be opaque.
>>>
>>> What was your model?
>> The prevalent use case probably is to start out with an empty topmost layer on
>> top of an existing file system. When things are modified, changes obviously
>> go into the topmost layer. Additional layers can later be stacked on top of
>> that, turning the previous topmost layer into a read-only lower layer.
>>
>> Overlaying preexisting file systems doesn't seem that important; users
>> commonly should be able to start out with an empty topmost layer instead. To
> Okay, that surprises me. Let me check my assumptions. I cc'd several
> people who seem to be actively using unionfs or aufs in ways that we
> want union mounts to replace. Do you start out with an empty topmost
> file system in most cases? Or do you prepopulate with some files in
> dirs you want to be transparent?
>
Our use would be for the Live CD and for Update testing - in both of
these scenarios I imagine that the top-most layer would start empty, yes.
Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists