[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101011211255.GA23882@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:12:55 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 5/6] x86, NMI, treat unknown NMI as hardware error
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:08:29PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 04:13:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > These systems are identified via the presentation of APEI HEST or
> > > > some PCI ID of the host bridge. The PCI ID of host bridge instead of
> > > > DMI ID is used, so that the checking can be done based on the platform
> > > > type instead of motherboard. This should be simpler and sufficient.
> > > >
> > > > The method to identify the platforms is designed by Andi Kleen.
> > >
> > > Why not make the new flag also a boot option so you can force it on for
> > > platforms where we don't auto whitelist it.
> >
> > You can already set it at run time using sysctl.
> >
> > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_unrecovered_nmi
> > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic_on_io_nmi
>
> I get the impression Alan was talking about the option
>
> unknown_nmi_as_hwerr
>
> which isn't hooked into a sysctl but will cause machines to panic.
Gah. disregard this, my brain is tired from a long day.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists