[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101010235015.2954811f@uxo>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:50:15 -0700
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sparc: make drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86
> > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree
> > branch.
>
> Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one
> of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time.
>
> 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c
>
> I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now
>
> 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86
>
> I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I
> cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this
> earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I
> needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds
> OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I
> merge it.
>
> g.
Okay. For reference, that patch is:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/
x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists