[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=cm8jQ5hY5qVA0bUvVemUGJvx-_B7-1sexGkvB@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:43:56 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Retry page fault when blocking on disk transfer.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Replacement patches are a bit cruel to people who've already reviewed
> the previous version. I always turn them into deltas so I can see what
> was changed. It is below.
Thanks Andrew. Sorry for the trouble, I'll know to avoid this next time.
> How well was the new swapin path tested?
Not as well as the file backed path - it's not gotten real production
use yet. However the plan is that this change will be in google's next
kernel update, so it will get a lot more more testing soon (starting
in ~1 week).
I did basic testing by dirtying an anon VMA larger that memory, then
accessing it in random order while another thread runs a mmap/munmap
loop, and checking that things behave as expected there (i.e. the
patch allows the mmap/munmap thread to progress without waiting for
the other thread swap-ins).
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists