[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101012131359.5ade7129.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:13:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with the tip tree
Hi Robert,
Today's linux-next merge of the oprofile tree got a conflict in
kernel/perf_event.c between commit
33696fc0d141bbbcb12f75b69608ea83282e3117 ("perf: Per PMU disable") from
the tip tree and commit 84c7991059c9c4530cc911137c5bf508a41ed129 ("perf:
New helper function for pmu name") from the oprofile tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/perf_event.c
index 64507ea,fc51268..0000000
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@@ -61,38 -67,41 +61,43 @@@ int sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate __rea
static atomic64_t perf_event_id;
-/*
- * Lock for (sysadmin-configurable) event reservations:
- */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(perf_resource_lock);
+void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }
-/*
- * Architecture provided APIs - weak aliases:
- */
-extern __weak const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
+void perf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- return NULL;
+ int *count = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_disable_count);
+ if (!(*count)++)
+ pmu->pmu_disable(pmu);
}
-void __weak hw_perf_disable(void) { barrier(); }
-void __weak hw_perf_enable(void) { barrier(); }
-
-void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }
-
+ extern __weak const char *perf_pmu_name(void)
+ {
+ return "pmu";
+ }
+
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, perf_disable_count);
-
-void perf_disable(void)
+void perf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- if (!__get_cpu_var(perf_disable_count)++)
- hw_perf_disable();
+ int *count = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_disable_count);
+ if (!--(*count))
+ pmu->pmu_enable(pmu);
}
-void perf_enable(void)
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, rotation_list);
+
+/*
+ * perf_pmu_rotate_start() and perf_rotate_context() are fully serialized
+ * because they're strictly cpu affine and rotate_start is called with IRQs
+ * disabled, while rotate_context is called from IRQ context.
+ */
+static void perf_pmu_rotate_start(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- if (!--__get_cpu_var(perf_disable_count))
- hw_perf_enable();
+ struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
+ struct list_head *head = &__get_cpu_var(rotation_list);
+
+ WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
+ if (list_empty(&cpuctx->rotation_list))
+ list_add(&cpuctx->rotation_list, head);
}
static void get_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists