[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010121854430.2909@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:56:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcio Saito <marcio@...lades.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Avantika Mathur <mathur@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, jblunck@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] allow low HZ values?
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> > We have told HPC folks for years that we need a kind of "NOHZ" mode
> > for HPC where we can transparently switch off the tick when only one
> > user space bound thread is active and switch back to normal once this
> > thing terminates or goes into the kernel via a syscall. Sigh, nothing
> > happened ever except for repeating the same crap patches over and
> > over.
>
> Jan Blunck posted a patch for this exactly few months ago.
> Unfortunately it didn't get the accounting right, but other than
> that it seemed like a reasonable starting point.
Unfortunately it did not get a lot of other things right either.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists