[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1286924512.2614.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:01:52 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jengelh@...ozas.de,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, mr.dash.four@...glemail.com,
pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] secmark: make secmark object handling generic
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 18:55 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:40 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > Right now secmark has lots of direct selinux calls. Use all LSM calls and
> > remove all SELinux specific knowledge. The only SELinux specific knowledge
> > we leave is the mode. The only point is to make sure that other LSMs at
> > least test this generic code before they assume it works. (They may also
> > have to make changes if they do not represent labels as strings)
>
> I'm sure you have, but I just want to make sure - you've tested this
> change (and the others for that matter) against the existing iptables
> userspace to make sure everything still works, right?
I did. The only patch which needs userspace changes is the exporting of
secctx over netlink. It appears the current userspace tools just
ignores unknown field types. I have a patch to userspace to tell it
about the new field and will send it after the kernel patch goes in.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists