[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101012053935.GD25875@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:09:35 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] memcg: disable local interrupts in
lock_page_cgroup()
* Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com> [2010-10-03 23:57:59]:
> If pages are being migrated from a memcg, then updates to that
> memcg's page statistics are protected by grabbing a bit spin lock
> using lock_page_cgroup(). In an upcoming commit memcg dirty page
> accounting will be updating memcg page accounting (specifically:
> num writeback pages) from softirq. Avoid a deadlocking nested
> spin lock attempt by disabling interrupts on the local processor
> when grabbing the page_cgroup bit_spin_lock in lock_page_cgroup().
> This avoids the following deadlock:
> statistic
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> inc_file_mapped
> rcu_read_lock
> start move
> synchronize_rcu
> lock_page_cgroup
> softirq
> test_clear_page_writeback
> mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(NR_WRITEBACK)
> rcu_read_lock
> lock_page_cgroup /* deadlock */
> unlock_page_cgroup
> rcu_read_unlock
> unlock_page_cgroup
> rcu_read_unlock
>
> By disabling interrupts in lock_page_cgroup, nested calls
> are avoided. The softirq would be delayed until after inc_file_mapped
> enables interrupts when calling unlock_page_cgroup().
>
> The normal, fast path, of memcg page stat updates typically
> does not need to call lock_page_cgroup(), so this change does
> not affect the performance of the common case page accounting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
--
It will take more convincing, all important functions (charge/uncharge
use lock_page_cgroup()). I'd like to see the page fault scalability
test results. I am not against this patch, just want to see the
scalability numbers.
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists