[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB030D099AFD@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:25:08 +0530
From: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@...com>
To: Evgeny Kuznetsov <EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@...ia.com>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>
CC: "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"khilman@...prootsystems.com" <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tero.kristo@...ia.com" <tero.kristo@...ia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was
dereferenced
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evgeny Kuznetsov [mailto:EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@...ia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 3:35 PM
> To: tony@...mide.com
> Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Balbi, Felipe; linux@....linux.org.uk;
> khilman@...prootsystems.com; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; Varadarajan,
> Charulatha; tero.kristo@...ia.com; ext-eugeny.kuznetsov@...ia.com
> Subject: [PATCHv2 1/1] omap: Ptr "isr_reg" tracked as NULL was
> dereferenced
>
> From: Evgeny Kuznetsov <ext-eugeny.kuznetsov@...ia.com>
>
> Value of "isr_reg" pointer is depend on configuration and GPIO method.
> Potentially it may have NULL value and it is dereferenced later
> in code. If pointer is NULL there is some kernel issue.
Can you elaborate?
> Warning and exit from function are added in this case.
> Also compilation check is added for correct architecture
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeny Kuznetsov <EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@...ia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> index c05c653..d04913c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
> @@ -1318,6 +1318,23 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
> if (bank->method == METHOD_GPIO_44XX)
> isr_reg = bank->base + OMAP4_GPIO_IRQSTATUS0;
> #endif
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) && \
> + !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
> +
> +#error "Incorrect arch configuration"
This is not required. If the architecture is not one of the above
mentioned, gpio_irq_handler() will not be used/called at all.
Also all the possible gpio methods for a given OMAP architecture are
already considered with "#ifdef"s and (bank->method) checks in
gpio_irq_handler().
> +
> +#endif
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!isr_reg))
> + goto exit;
For the above mentioned reason, this isr_reg would be non-NULL. Have
you observed this error anytime?
Also, the omap-gpio code has similar code spread all over and has to be
anyway cleaned-up. Is there any reason why gpio_irq_handler() alone is
addressed in this patch?
> +
> while(1) {
> u32 isr_saved, level_mask = 0;
> u32 enabled;
> @@ -1377,6 +1394,7 @@ static void gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
> configured, we must unmask the bank interrupt only after
> handler(s) are executed in order to avoid spurious bank
> interrupt */
> +exit:
> if (!unmasked)
> desc->chip->unmask(irq);
>
> --
> 1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists