[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101013.094659.226765041.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: james@...anarts.com
Cc: zambrano@...adcom.com, jpirko@...hat.com,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, hauke@...ke-m.de,
Larry.Finger@...inger.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44: fix resume, request_irq after hw reset
From: James Hogan <james@...anarts.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:22:12 +0100
> @@ -2309,6 +2303,12 @@ static int b44_resume(struct ssb_device *sdev)
> netif_device_attach(bp->dev);
> spin_unlock_irq(&bp->lock);
>
> + rc = request_irq(dev->irq, b44_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
> + if (rc) {
> + netdev_err(dev, "request_irq failed\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> b44_enable_ints(bp);
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
Since you've moved the request_irq() down, you'll need to adjust
the error handling so that it undoes side effects made by this
function up until this point.
F.e. netif_device_attach() has to be undone for one thing.
Next, b44_init_rings() allocates memory that you must now free.
Etc. etc. etc.
This change is not so simple. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists