lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:54:15 -0400
From:	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
To:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Philipp Merkel <mail@...lmerk.de>,
	Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] hid: egalax: Report zero as minimum pressure

On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:58 +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> The firmware reports a logical minimum of one, but in order for
> userspace applications to correctly map all reported values to
> non-zero pressure, the driver needs to report a logical minimum of
> zero.  Fixed with this patch.
> 
> Tested-by: Philipp Merkel <mail@...lmerk.de>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-egalax.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-egalax.c b/drivers/hid/hid-egalax.c
> index 3b490a3..2aba897 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-egalax.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-egalax.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static int egalax_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
>  			input_set_events_per_packet(input, MAX_EVENTS);
>  			return 1;
>  		case HID_DG_TIPPRESSURE:
> +			field->logical_minimum = 0;
>  			hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max,
>  					EV_ABS, ABS_MT_PRESSURE);
>  			set_abs(input, ABS_MT_PRESSURE, field, 0);

I'm a little unsure of whether the logical_minimum field should be
modified by the driver or if the range of the evdev property should be
the only change. I can't see anything in the hid code that looks like it
would be adversely affected by this change though.

-- Chase

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ