linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] memblock related fixes for -tip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CB5F688.5090205@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:24 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] memblock related fixes for -tip

On 10/13/2010 09:31 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>  On 10/12/2010 10:40 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 04:37 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>  On 10/12/2010 02:12 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> On 10/12/2010 11:41 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>>>  On 10/04/2010 02:57 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>> Please check memblock related patches
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [PATCH 1/4] memblock: Fix big size with find_region()
>>>>>> [PATCH -v5 2/4] x86, memblock: Fix crashkernel allocation
>>>>>> [PATCH 3/4] x86, memblock: Remove __memblock_x86_find_in_range_size()
>>>>>> [PATCH 4/4] x86, mm, memblock, 32bit: Make add_highpages honor early reserved ranges
>>>>>>
>>>>>> first one should get into core/memblock branch, and others should be in x86/mm/memeblock branch
>>>>> BTW, the memblock changes prevent the kernel from booting under Xen; it
>>>>> crashes while setting up the linear maps.  I haven't worked out what's
>>>>> failing yet, aside from bisecting it down to one of a9ce6bc151000 or
>>>>> 72d7c3b33c9808 (they don't compile in isolation so I had to skip them,
>>>>> but both are likely looking, but unfortunately large, complex and hard
>>>>> to further subdivide).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll look further into this, but just a heads-up for the upcoming merge
>>>>> window.
>>>>>
>>>> please use 
>>>>
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-2.6-yinghai.git memblock
>>>>
>>>> to find which commit cause xen broken.
>>>>
>>>> two xen related patch are folded into first converting commit.
>>> Note that ce883cfc65c51e24 doesn't compile:
>>>
>>> /home/jeremy/git/upstream/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c: In function
>>> ‘find_e820_area_size’:
>>> /home/jeremy/git/upstream/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:764: error: expected
>>> ‘;’ before ‘return’
>>>
>>> However, I can fix it with the obvious fix, and the Xen boot failure
>>> bisects to this change.
>>>
>>> The specific crash is when constructing the initial pagetable, when Xen
>>> tries to remap a newly allocated pagetable page read-only, and finds the
>>> allocated page isn't mapped within the linear map. Since it is in the
>>> middle of creating the linear map, I guess its quite possible that the
>>> allocation order has changed, and it starts allocating pages which are
>>> not yet mapped, whereas before it was allocating already-mapped ones.
>> you can limit the allocation of pagetable page further ...
>>
>> xen doesn't honor max_pfn_mapped?
> 
> What do you mean?  Xen sets max_pfn_mapped when it does the early
> mapping of the kernel space, but I don't see how it relates to this
> stage of mapping?

We are using max_pfn_mapped to upper limit to find range that can be used as early stage.

so maybe you have max_pfn_mapped set too early and too big?

> 
>>> I'll see if I can confirm this hypothesis and see if I can work around
>>> it (is poses some problems, because it means that when the pages later
>>> become mapped, I need to make sure they get mapped RO).
>> please check following debug patch, it will try find area bottom up...
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] x86, memblock: Add x86 version of memblock_find_in_range()
>>
>> Generic version is going from high to low, and it seems it can not find
>> right area compact enough.
>>
>> the x86 version will go from goal to limit and just like the way We used
>> for early_res
>>
>> use ARCH_FIND_MEMBLOCK_AREA to select from them.
> 
> Thanks, that fixes the problem.  I would ideally like to make the the
> Xen code independent of the page allocation ordering, but it looks like
> it will be very tricky since we effectively make use of the pagetable as
> a way of storing one bit of information about each page before there's a
> struct page in place.
> 
> So this patch looks good to me (but there's no need to make it a
> separate config option).

that is for debug purpose only. We really want to do top-down than bottom-up.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/