[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19637.64300.446447.318000@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:32:12 +0200
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mikpe@...uu.se, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.36-rc regression] occasional complete system hangs on
sparc64 SMP
David Miller writes:
> From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:36:16 +0200
>
> > I've been testing older kernels and can now say that 2.6.35-git5
> > and newer kernels are definitely affected, but 2.6.35-git4 seems
> > solid. I'll dig deeper into the .35-git4->git5 changes towards
> > the end of next week.
> >
> > I never got any data out of sysrq-y or any other sysrq when a hang
> > occurs; usually they'd just print the name of the command but no data,
> > sometimes they'd oops and crash the kernel even harder.
>
> So I haven't been ignoring this report, but I cannot reproduce
> it on the SB2500 I have access to right now.
>
> I've been doing gcc builds and testsuite runs in a loop for
> several days.
>
> Occaisionally I get a dying 'as' which I have seen before and
> plan to investigate, but no hard hangs and no crashes.
>
> I'll keep prodding, but if you can narrow it down further
> please let us know.
I've looked at the .35-git4 to -git5 changes, and unfortunately
they cannot be relevant for the sparc64 hangs: the bulk of the
changes are x86-only, and the remaining few are totally harmless.
So either .35-git4 is also broken, even though I haven't been
able to break it after a week of gcc bootstraps and test runs,
or some of the hangs I've seen in later kernels have been caused
by some other bug. Either way, I don't think I can make progress
bisecting & testing older kernels.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists