[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1286996978-7007-2-git-send-email-ncrao@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:09:35 -0700
From: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] sched: do not consider SCHED_IDLE tasks to be cache hot
This patch adds a check in task_hot to return if the task has SCHED_IDLE
policy. SCHED_IDLE tasks have very low weight, and when run with regular
workloads, are typically scheduled many milliseconds apart. There is no
need to consider these tasks hot for load balancing.
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index dc85ceb..6a9bdeb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2003,6 +2003,9 @@ task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
return 0;
+ if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* Buddy candidates are cache hot:
*/
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists