[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB63E57.2000300@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:18:47 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] memblock related fixes for -tip
On 10/13/2010 04:14 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> The Xen code is setting the max_pfn_mapped correctly, but it is just
> being overridden by:
>
> max_pfn_mapped = KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> in setup_arch() - and KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is hard-coded to 512MB...
>
> How is this correct? Does kernel/head_64.S map everything up to 512MB
> or something?
>
Yes:
/*
* 512 MB kernel mapping. We spend a full page on this pagetable
* anyway.
*
* The kernel code+data+bss must not be bigger than that.
*
* (NOTE: at +512MB starts the module area, see MODULES_VADDR.
* If you want to increase this then increase MODULES_VADDR
* too.)
*/
PMDS(0, __PAGE_KERNEL_LARGE_EXEC,
KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE/PMD_SIZE)
This is, however, wrong in the sense that it obviously shouldn't be
getting executed on the Xen codepath.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists