[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1010131507110.3834@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:07:40 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, paul.moore@...com,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jengelh@...ozas.de,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, mr.dash.four@...glemail.com,
pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] secmark: do not return early if there was no error
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 10:38 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Eric Paris wrote:
> >
> > > Commit 4a5a5c73 attempted to pass decent error messages back to userspace for
> > > netfilter errors. In xt_SECMARK.c however the patch screwed up and returned
> > > on 0 (aka no error) early and didn't finish setting up secmark. This results
> > > in a kernel BUG if you use SECMARK.
> > >
> >
> > Does this need to go into current Linus?
>
> It's been broken since v2.6.35-rc1 so it's not exactly new, but yes,
> it's broken and will bug like this in current Linus.
Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
(Guessing this should go in via the networking tree).
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists