[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB6A1AB.4030800@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:22:35 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> I was going to mention that as an idea, but I thought storing the metadata
>>> for certain debugging features might differ from the two allocators so
>>> substantially that it would be even more convoluted and difficult to
>>> maintain?
>>
>> We could have some callbacks to store allocator specific metadata?
On 10/14/10 1:41 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> It depends on whether we could share the same base for both slab (unified
> allocator) and slub, which you snipped from your reply, that would make
> this cleaner.
Argh. Why would we want to introduce something that's effectively a new
allocator based on SLUB? If there's something controversial in the
current patch series, lets just keep it out of mainline. A "rewrite" is
the reason we're in this mess so lets not repeat the same mistake again!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists