[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101014173103U.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:36:28 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] contigous big page allocator
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:24:21 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:07:12PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:01:43 +0200
> > Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> > > >
> > > > What this wants to do:
> > > > allocates a contiguous chunk of pages larger than MAX_ORDER.
> > > > for device drivers (camera? etc..)
> > >
> > > I think to really move forward you need a concrete use case
> > > actually implemented in tree.
> >
> > As already pointed out, some embeded drivers need physcailly
> > contignous memory. Currenlty, they use hacky tricks (e.g. playing with
> > the boot memory allocators). There are several proposals for this like
>
> Are any of those in mainline?
The tricks or the proposals?
I think that at least one mainline driver in arm uses such trick but I
can't recall the name. Better to ask on the arm mainling list. Also I
heard that the are some out-of-tree patches about this.
I think that any such proposal hasn't merged yet. If you are looking
for such examples, here's one:
http://lwn.net/Articles/401107/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists