linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: dma engine support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikyCBrXsvV_ZqYt7tHPRK4WGNLt8654Mhec70rB@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:27:47 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	"Sosnowski, Maciej" <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: dma engine support

[ added Maciej ]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> Simple hack to use dma engine for tun RX.
> Only one skb in flight at the moment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> I am still looking at handling multiple skbs, but
> sending this out for early flames and improvement suggestions.
>
> Loopback testing seems to show only minor performance gains:
> this is not really suprising as data is hot in cache already.
> Where I would expect this to help more is with incoming
> traffic from an external NIC. This still needs to be tested.

Actually it is interesting that you did not see a performance loss
because the dma performs the transfer in memory so the destination
will be cache cold in the dma case compared to a cpu copy.

[..]
> +int tun_dma_copybreak = 0x10000;
> +module_param_named(dma_copybreak, tun_dma_copybreak, int, 0644);

What platform are you using for testing?  If this proves beneficial we
may need to adjust this value to have a platform specific default,
similar to how ioatdma sets tcp_dma_copybreak depending on the
hardware version.  You will notice that on Nehalem class hardware
(drivers/dma/ioat/dma_v3.c) the default is set to 256K effectively
disabling offload as the overhead of managing the dma engine
overshadows any offload advantage.

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/