[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287016477.10264.418.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:34:37 -0400
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.36-rc7
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 20:24 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 16:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:45 AM, James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@...e.de> wrote:
> > > This patch set fixes a couple of longstanding bugs in SCSI. The VPD
> > > patch fix a possible buffer overrun in the VPD code (only tripped if the
> > > device has a huge number of VPD pages). The other is where the status
> > > return code on our BSG interface is wrongly right shifted one place.
> >
> > Umm. That other patch seems to be utter crap.
> >
> > > - hdr->device_status = status_byte(rq->errors);
> > > + hdr->device_status = rq->errors && 0xff;
> >
> > That's pure shit. Please look at it for one second, and don't send me
> > crap like this.
>
> What's wrong with it? device_status() is an ancient SCSI-1 macro that
> dates from the time the status was left shifted by 1, which makes the
> value wrong according to the sg interface spec. We should really remove
> it, but there's still a few ancient drivers using it. the SG interface
> requires the full status byte, which is what the bottom most byte of
> req_errors is ... hence the change.
OK, right ... several people pointed out in private email that it was &&
not & ... I'll fix it when I'm slightly less jet lagged.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists