[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101014100609.GA29611@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:06:09 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] tcm: Unify INQUIRY subsystem plugin handling
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:54:47AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> It would make the most sense to just go ahead and set a pre-configured
> struct queue_limits into transport_add_device_to_core_hba() from
> subsystem specific ->create_virtdevice() code, and just drop whatever
> unnecessary struct se_subsystem_api ops are duplicate of what is being
> registered as defaults with struct queue_limits.
That sounds good. Note that by now it's not just queue_limits but
also other paramters, so a rename of the structure might be a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists