lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:20:03 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] perf: Add ability to dump user regs

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:06:30PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 07:06 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> Add new PERF_SAMPLE_UREGS to perf sample type. This will dump the
> >> user space context as it was before the user entered the kernel for
> >> whatever reason.
> >>
> >> This is going to be useful to bring Dwarf CFI based stack unwinding
> >> on top of samples.
> >
> > This doesn't address any of the issues that were raised previously.
> >
> > There's a reason we don't have PERF_SAMPLE_*REGS like things.
> >
> We definitively need to find a solution to this problem. It is important
> to export this kind of information to users when using PEBS, for instance



Would you need to export only a part of the regs for cases like PEBS?



> 
> What is exported depends on what is monitored and not just the ABI
> of the kernel. On a 64-bit kernel, you may capture samples from
> i386 or x86_64. Somehow the record needs to be self describing.
> 
> What about something like:
> struct  {
>       int type; /* 32-bit, 64-bit */
>       int nr;    /* number of regs */
>       struct {
>           int reg_name; /* taken from an enum with all possible regs */
>           u64 reg_value;
>       } [0]
> };



Yeah but in this case we can probably avoid to embed all the regnames
in every dumps. This can be retrieved from what we asked in the attrs,
which could be a u64 bitmap that tells which regs we want? (that only
if we want a per reg granularity).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ