[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101015124357.GC5969@erda.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:43:57 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with the tip tree
On 11.10.10 22:18:28, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the oprofile tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/oprofile/common.c between commit
> 38a81da2205f94e8a2a834b51a6b99c91fc7c2e8 ("perf events: Clean up pid
> passing") from the tip tree and commit
> 3d90a00763b51e1db344a7430c966be723b67a29 ("oprofile: Abstract the
> perf-events backend") from the oprofile tree.
>
> The latter moved the code modified by the former, so I used the version
> of this file from the oprofile tree. I also applied the effect of the
> tip tree patch to the new file drivers/oprofile/oprofile_perf.c:
Stephen,
I merged both trees and updated my oprofile for-next branch. They
should merge now without conflicts.
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists